Forum

Paul

Hi, I've just started up with spiders and found them to be a lot more difficult than I imagined. However I'm persevering and wondered if this could be Philodromus aureolus. The epigyne looks similar I thought but would like confirmation.

Thanks, Paul

It is impossible to be sure from your photograph and the small size of the inset epigyne, but it appears to show the arch dividing the epigyne of cespitum. However it simply isn't possible to see enough without a specimen under a microscope.

Thanks, Paul

I spotted this amazing structure on the underside of a sycamore leaf the other day and have provisionally identified it as Paidiscura pallens. Could anyone help confirm this or point me in the right direction if this is not correct. It was recorded in a wooded valley in the Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales.

Thanks so much in advance for your help! Hopefully pic attached.

Andrea

Many thanks Paul.

It looks like a Pardosa wolf spider.

Check here http://www.jorgenlissner.dk/families.aspx 

and here http://ednieuw.home.xs4all.nl/Spiders/thumbnails/spidhome_thumbnails.htm 

for pictures of Lycosidae Wolf Spiders and Pisauridae including the Raft Spiders.

Evan

NB you can never be sure of an spider ID until you have used a microscope to check the tiny details (must not use that as a euphemism in future! Could get into trouble)

Many thanks Paul.

Hi Peter has seen the Spider photo,s and came up with the nearest to this would be Sitticus pubescens,but not sure. The spider id of Aelurillus v-insignitus is a much close match.

Many thanks. paul.

They do look very much the same spider and marking down the back, the area where these spider like is almost the same sunny areas on heathland, and also on short, stony calcareous grassland. I would happy rename the spiders id if someone else would agree.

Many thanks Evan.

With Clubiona you will not get to the degree of detail needed with a lens - look in the Collins Field Guide on spider of Britain and north-western Europe to see the number of Clubiona and the detail in the adult male palps, which will not be discernible adequately using a lens. With some very few exceptions, it is simply not possible to be sure of an id in this genus without the use of a microscope. A very few species provide clues because they have specific patterns such as Clubiona comta and the much larger C. corticalis, but otherwise you are left with subtle differences in size and sometimes body shape etc as the main guidance in the field - but this cannot be used for more than guesswork identification in the field. Female epigynes can be even more problemmatic, even presenting some difficulty under a microscope on occasions where the details visible don't obviously match the figures in the books. Clubiona are certainly not the genus to choose to begin identification to species level!

In the habitat you describe, there are a number of likely species, C. pallidula, C. terrestris and more, but only a specimen will determine which one.

Thank you for the update. It is as I feared - not as easy as it looks.

For info: I found the spider low down, just above ground level within wet, ash and maple woodland, on lime rich clay soils. Other than in periods of prolonged drought, the undergrowth generally remains remains damp and lush.

Next time I shall try an 8-diopter lens on the front of my macro lens and attempt to get that detail.

Regards, Brian

Your picture is certainly an adult male Clubiona species, but it could be any one of a number of species. The only way to be sure is by microscopical examination of the male palp, where each species has a distinctive structure not visible in a photograph in sufficient detail to see the necessary diagnostic bits. Your photo suggests the spider was on the leaf of a bush or tree? If so it is very unlikely to be Clubiona reclusa, a spider usually found in tall grassland, herbage or the drier parts of marshes. There are a range of possibilities both with Clubiona found in grasslands and herbage and those usually found on trees or scrub and only a few species are at all distinctive in their pattern. It is a genus of look-alikes!

I hope that I have the identification correct and in some small way have contributed to the site.

A bit about myself: I'm retired and a member of the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust, where I wander around taking photos of the local wildlife, big or small, fur or feather, though my passion is photographing hoverflies.

I look forward to meeting more spiders!

Brian

Portia fimbriata from Australia, a salticid that often hunts other salticids has some interesting hunting strategies.

Cryptic stalking and prey selection paper:- http://jeb.biologists.org/content/203/22/3485.full.pdf 

Short clip of the cryptic stalking:- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRIpYVwY820 

Route Selection:- http://www.rifters.com/real/articles/Tarsitano%20and%20Jackson%20-%20Spider%20selects%20detour%20routes.pdf 

Closer to home, the common salticus scenicus would make a good subject for research along the same lines perhaps.

Regards, Matt

If you can send me a spider, to Peter Harvey, 32 Lodge Lane, Grays, Essex RM16 2YP I will be able to confirm your species. A spider will be quite safe inside a small plastic container with a very little dampened tissue (cave spiders like humidity) inside a padded envelope. Please include a location (postcode or Ordnance Survey grid reference) so that your record can be added to the recording scheme.

There are a very large number of European species and we have not found pattern or leg markings completely reliable in Essex, so id to species level needs microscopical examination of an adult.

I found this spider on a bio blitz with my kids. I believe I have identified as Amaurobius ferox but can anyone confirm as I am new to spider identification! Thanks Sally

Why looking for new jumpers to capture , i spotted this little one moving a round.It was only 3-4 mm in size a gave my a good run around before i had a good image. Many thanks for looking. As before i have loaded the grid ref point on the main photo.

Paul.