Is it inside? From the picture looks like an outside wall. There is also no scale, so the size of the spider can't be properly judged.
I maintain that to identify this from the picture provided is very unwise, and is indicative of a modern fashion to believe that everything can be identified from a photograph, something I believe will result in the degradation of the scientific value of biological records. There are plenty of times in my arachnological lifetime when I have provisionally identified a spider in the field using a lens and been convinced I have found a particular species, then subsequently after examination under a microscope later to find I was wrong. The same thing applies to many photographic ids, except for a rather few easily recognisable ones.
Developed by Teknica