Forum

Welcome to our general Forum page.  Please feel free to post a comment on any issue or topic area. If you upload a picture, it will be available for you to insert here with your post. IF YOU WANT HELP WITH IDENTIFICATION, PLEASE PROVIDE A FULL POSTCODE OR GRID REFERENCE AND DATE of the record in your post so that it can be added to the recording scheme. You can send a message or ask a question about British spider identification here. If your query is about spiders from other parts of the World, please find another forum. We are unable to help. You will need to register and be logged-on to post to the forum. Find out more and Help adding forum posts. You will find some helper toolbar buttons in the add post and post editor, as well as your most recently uploaded pictures as toolbar buttons. Click on the toolbar picture to add it to your post.

Sun 2nd February 2020 21:54 by Gustav Clark
iRecord verification
I think recording societies for 'minor' groups look at iRecord and dismiss it as suitable for birds and butterflies but too crude for their purposes.  I would say they are wrong and that they are denying their recorders access to a valuable and flexible tool.  Spiders are not unique in being difficult to identify.  Beetles, hoverflies, fungus gnats, ants - they all rely on recorders knowing when microscopic work is absolutely required.  Inter alia i do survey for ants.  Identifying them relies on checking for hairs on the antennae, or the number of teeth on the mandibles.  if I submit a record without the required level of detail then I expect to have it rejected.  If it is critical then I am asked for a voucher specimen.  I also do millipedes and centipedes. All their records are via iRecord.  They are difficult, with all the same problems of unidentifiable juveniles, or only one sex being determinable.  One person verifies records for the whole country, and it works. There is one additional advantage we would get from using iRecord.  If you look at SRS records for Pholcus phalangioides you will see that it is absent from most of the country.  Our current recorder base does not supply records for what they see as common species.  Welcoming records from the whole biological recording community would get people used to recording spiders and help us avoid situations like this.
link


Archives: Jan 2020 Dec 2019 Nov 2019 Oct 2019 Sep 2019 Aug 2019 Jul 2019 Jun 2019 May 2019 Apr 2019 Mar 2019 Feb 2019 Jan 2019 Dec 2018 Nov 2018 Oct 2018 Sep 2018 Aug 2018 Jul 2018 Jun 2018 May 2018 Apr 2018 Mar 2018 Feb 2018 Jan 2018 Nov 2017 Oct 2017 Sep 2017 Aug 2017 Jul 2017 Jun 2017 May 2017 Apr 2017 Mar 2017 Feb 2017 Dec 2016 Oct 2016 Sep 2016 Aug 2016 Jul 2016 Jun 2016 May 2016 Apr 2016 Mar 2016 Feb 2016 Jan 2016 Dec 2015 Nov 2015 Oct 2015 Sep 2015 Aug 2015 Jul 2015 Jun 2015 May 2015 Apr 2015 Mar 2015 Feb 2015 Dec 2014 Nov 2014 Oct 2014 Sep 2014 Aug 2014 Jul 2014 Jun 2014 May 2014 Apr 2014 Mar 2014 Feb 2014 Jan 2014 Dec 2013 Nov 2013 Oct 2013 Sep 2013 Aug 2013 Jul 2013 Jun 2013 May 2013 Apr 2013 Feb 2013 Jan 2013 Dec 2012 Nov 2012 Oct 2012 Sep 2012 Aug 2012 Jul 2012 Jun 2012 May 2012 Feb 2012 Jan 2012 Dec 2011 Nov 2011 Oct 2011 Aug 2011 May 2011 Mar 2011 Dec 2010 Nov 2010 Sep 2010 latest posts